Determining whether BISSELL or Shark vacuums are better depends on various factors, including specific needs, preferences, and budget. Here is a detailed comparison based on the provided sources:
### Suction Power
– **Shark**: Known for its powerful “never-lose suction” technology, Shark vacuums generally offer stronger suction power, which is particularly beneficial for pet hair and thicker carpets[3].
– **BISSELL**: Provides standard suction capacity, which may not be as strong as Shark’s but is often sufficient for general cleaning tasks[3].
### Dust Capacity
– **Shark**: Can hold between 0.6 to 1.1 gallons of dust, making it more efficient for larger cleaning tasks without frequent emptying[3].
– **BISSELL**: Holds between 0.11 and 0.52 gallons of dust, which means it may require more frequent emptying compared to Shark vacuums[3].
### Build Quality and Design
– **Shark**: Generally praised for sturdy yet maneuverable designs. Models like the Shark Navigator Swivel Pro Complete are noted for their strong suction, ease of use, and lightweight design[2].
– **BISSELL**: Often described as budget-friendly but with a somewhat cheap build quality. For example, the BISSELL PowerForce Helix is effective but has fragile components and lacks maneuverability[1].
### Versatility and Features
– **Shark**: Offers a wide range of models with various features, including self-emptying bases, lift-away canisters, and HEPA filters. The Shark Wandvac Self-Empty Cordless Stick Vacuum is noted for its maneuverability and technological features[2].
– **BISSELL**: Also offers a variety of models, from compact handhelds to bulky uprights. The BISSELL CrossWave Cordless Max is a hybrid vacuum/mop that can handle both dry and wet messes, making it versatile for different cleaning needs[1].
### Maintenance and Ease of Use
– **Shark**: Generally easy to maintain with features like self-cleaning brush rolls and easy-to-empty dust bins. However, some models may have a complicated setup process[2].
– **BISSELL**: Maintenance can be more cumbersome, especially with models like the PowerForce Helix, which requires removing the brush guard to untangle hair from the brushroll[1].
### Price and Value
– **Shark**: Typically more expensive, with prices ranging from $90 to $500 depending on the model and features. However, they are often considered a good value for their performance and durability[2].
– **BISSELL**: More budget-friendly, with many models being affordable and offering good performance for the price. However, they may not match the high-end features and build quality of Shark vacuums[1].
### Warranty
– **Shark**: Offers a longer warranty period of five years, providing more extended coverage for their products[3].
– **BISSELL**: Offers a shorter warranty period of two to three years, depending on the model[3].
### Conclusion
– **For Strong Suction and Durability**: Shark vacuums are generally better, especially for homes with pets and thick carpets, due to their powerful suction and robust build.
– **For Budget-Friendly Options**: BISSELL vacuums are a good choice, offering decent performance at a lower cost, though they may lack some of the advanced features and durability of Shark models.
Ultimately, the choice between BISSELL and Shark will depend on your specific cleaning needs, budget, and preferences.
Which vacuum is better for pet hair, BISSELL or Shark?
